htc one x?

A place to share PC, Mobile phone and SatNav related experiences and ask techy questions.

Moderator: Forum Moderators

Drew
RT GOD
Posts: 8280
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 4:25 pm
feedback: 194637
Location: Stevenage, North Herts
Contact:

htc one x?

Post by Drew »

any good?

looking for a new phone again, anything out there?

cheers
Drew
Din
Rovertech Moderator
Rovertech Moderator
Posts: 10894
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 8:13 pm
feedback: 901190

Re: htc one x?

Post by Din »

Dunno... but want :D

I have the origional desire, very good phone if a lack on internal storage,bar that i cant fault it :)
Dan Overton, 2002 MG ZS Turbo.
Vard66 wrote: our feelings about saloons shall never be the wedge between us
Image
jase
RT GOD
Posts: 3785
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 8:39 pm
feedback: 780098
Location: Chester

Re: htc one x?

Post by jase »

Im thinking about one of these to Drew as mine is up in 2 weeks.
I dont think there much debate if your after a dogs doggies gizmo, just between this and the galaxy 2.



J
"To try is the first step on the long road to failure"

mk3 200ti: 303bhp +323ftlbs http://www.rovertech.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3553
BMW 135i: 390bhp +410ftlbs
Feedback: http://www.rovertech.net/forum/viewtopi ... 44&t=83073
Drew
RT GOD
Posts: 8280
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 4:25 pm
feedback: 194637
Location: Stevenage, North Herts
Contact:

Re: htc one x?

Post by Drew »

yeah not that i think ill use it properly but looks good :roll:

Drew
rovex
RT BiKiloPoster
Posts: 2391
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 7:23 am
feedback: 1042809

Re: htc one x?

Post by rovex »

Its an excellent phone and because its a Sense 4 phone it will come with extra dropbox space. I forget how much, but its quite a lot.

Im waiting because the Galaxy S3 is due out in a month and i want to see what Sammy have for us. I currently have a Galaxy S2, probably still the best phone you can buy now it has ICS. The One X is great but the S2 is a match still in many areas and is cheaper.
Image
Din
Rovertech Moderator
Rovertech Moderator
Posts: 10894
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 8:13 pm
feedback: 901190

Re: htc one x?

Post by Din »

Im very tempted....
Dan Overton, 2002 MG ZS Turbo.
Vard66 wrote: our feelings about saloons shall never be the wedge between us
Image
Dave_ZS
RT BiKiloPoster
Posts: 2933
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 2:17 pm
feedback: 1129866
Location: Helensburgh, Argyll & Bute, Scotland
Contact:

Re: htc one x?

Post by Dave_ZS »

Think I know what the Desire Sport is gettin upgraded to.
YWCY

Image
'04 MG ZS+ 120...the ShedEss.
rovex
RT BiKiloPoster
Posts: 2391
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 7:23 am
feedback: 1042809

Re: htc one x?

Post by rovex »

Yeah, for me its the One X or the S3. Nothing else is peaking my interest. The S3 is what's holding me back. Its all about the S3s screen and CPU.
Image
Phoenix3dfx225
Rovertech Kiloposter
Posts: 1321
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 12:11 pm
feedback: 1308326
Location: Lytham St Annes, Lancashire

Re: htc one x?

Post by Phoenix3dfx225 »

S3 is going to smash all other phones out of the water. Its a quad core lots of ram and large hi res screen. Release date to be announced on 2nd May. I'm still on a SGS 1 from a 24month contract so cant change till Oct'12 but least then the s3 should be back in stock and not as much to purchase as it would have been out for a few months already.

ICS is also great over previous android OS's and that even with it running a little slower on my SGS but that because its only a single core 512mb ram trying its best to hold its own.
Image
rovex
RT BiKiloPoster
Posts: 2391
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 7:23 am
feedback: 1042809

Re: htc one x?

Post by rovex »

The specs of the S3 are still in debate. It could still have a dual core Cortex A15 CPU rather than a Quad A9, the A15 being the better option..
The screen is still an unknown, we HOPE its a SuperAMOLED+ not just a SuperAMOLED like the Galaxy Nexus.

The HTC is good because HTC have great services to back up the phone experience. Its also rather attractive, but the Tegra CPU is slightly off-putting to me. Its just a bit old and inefficient compared to the superior Samsung Exynos technology or Qualcomm S3 hybrid A9/A15.
Image
Din
Rovertech Moderator
Rovertech Moderator
Posts: 10894
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 8:13 pm
feedback: 901190

Re: htc one x?

Post by Din »

I found it on a £27.00 per month deal with 500mb and 300 mins with 02 and no charge for the phone !! thats about what i spend pay as you go with the Desire.... so tempting !

Im presumeing the Galaxy s3 will be more expensive than this HTC at the outset ?

Dunno... ill have to think about it, i have been on pay as you for so long now... :lol:
Dan Overton, 2002 MG ZS Turbo.
Vard66 wrote: our feelings about saloons shall never be the wedge between us
Image
rovex
RT BiKiloPoster
Posts: 2391
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 7:23 am
feedback: 1042809

Re: htc one x?

Post by rovex »

The S2 was actually cheaper than the HTC sensation last year, so its likely the S3 wont be more than the One X.
Image
Din
Rovertech Moderator
Rovertech Moderator
Posts: 10894
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 8:13 pm
feedback: 901190

Re: htc one x?

Post by Din »

Hmm, probably better to wait abit then, or indeed wait for more reveiws etc, sealed in battery is abit :| though.
Dan Overton, 2002 MG ZS Turbo.
Vard66 wrote: our feelings about saloons shall never be the wedge between us
Image
rovex
RT BiKiloPoster
Posts: 2391
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 7:23 am
feedback: 1042809

Re: htc one x?

Post by rovex »

Well will know in about 2 weeks so not long to wait.
Image
Phoenix3dfx225
Rovertech Kiloposter
Posts: 1321
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 12:11 pm
feedback: 1308326
Location: Lytham St Annes, Lancashire

Re: htc one x?

Post by Phoenix3dfx225 »

Din wrote:Hmm, probably better to wait abit then, or indeed wait for more reveiws etc, sealed in battery is abit :| though.
Whats got a sealed battery? The HTC? Yerh I would struggle with that, wore out my SGS battery in the first 12months and now run an extended life 3000mah over the standard 1500mah. It makes the phone a bit chunky, but I wasnt getting through an office day on the standard battery with my heavy use for work, sat nav, phone calls and emails etc.

Also the chunky size stopped it from slipping from my big daft hands lol.
Image
Din
Rovertech Moderator
Rovertech Moderator
Posts: 10894
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 8:13 pm
feedback: 901190

Re: htc one x?

Post by Din »

Yeah the one x is sealed :|
Dan Overton, 2002 MG ZS Turbo.
Vard66 wrote: our feelings about saloons shall never be the wedge between us
Image
rovex
RT BiKiloPoster
Posts: 2391
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 7:23 am
feedback: 1042809

Re: htc one x?

Post by rovex »

Well the S3 is know a known quantity. Its basic spec blows the One X away, but im not taken with the looks. Its bland, a bit cheap and the colour choice is a bit horrible.
Image
Phoenix3dfx225
Rovertech Kiloposter
Posts: 1321
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 12:11 pm
feedback: 1308326
Location: Lytham St Annes, Lancashire

Re: htc one x?

Post by Phoenix3dfx225 »

rovex wrote:Well the S3 is know a known quantity. Its basic spec blows the One X away, but im not taken with the looks. Its bland, a bit cheap and the colour choice is a bit horrible.
I could be swayed by LG's latest offering. Metal case, better screen and 2gb of RAM!
Image
rovex
RT BiKiloPoster
Posts: 2391
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 7:23 am
feedback: 1042809

Re: htc one x?

Post by rovex »

The problem with LG is their software isn't very good and 2 GB of ram is bit of a gimmick right now.
Image
Phoenix3dfx225
Rovertech Kiloposter
Posts: 1321
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 12:11 pm
feedback: 1308326
Location: Lytham St Annes, Lancashire

Re: htc one x?

Post by Phoenix3dfx225 »

rovex wrote:The problem with LG is their software isn't very good and 2 GB of ram is bit of a gimmick right now.
Depends on the type of user you are. I use my phone 24/7 and not just for texting and phone calls.
Image
jase
RT GOD
Posts: 3785
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 8:39 pm
feedback: 780098
Location: Chester

Re: htc one x?

Post by jase »

I upgraded a week ago
Id short listed the 2 primary phones from HTC and Samsung (One X, One S, S2 and S3)
S3 went out straight away as it was only on pre order and tarifs were some 25% higher than the other phones.
Then my favourite the One X went. Stories of its battery life I couldnt be doing with especially when i couldnt carry a spare! Plus its simply to big. My Desire HD felt like a brick and was hard to hold and the X is even heftier.
So ended up getting the One S.
The S2 I deemed to old now, espeically as the newer more powerful HTC's were the same price on contracts.

So I ended up with the one S.
Im actually quite pleased, it might not be the heavyweight of the S3 or X but it feels like a quality phone rather than a laptop in your pocket.
And the battery lasts 2days of light use :) (vs 1day of light use on my HD)
Only real problem is the screen feels and is narrow vs the 4.7 inchers and the onboard storage is effectivly just 10gb :|
"To try is the first step on the long road to failure"

mk3 200ti: 303bhp +323ftlbs http://www.rovertech.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3553
BMW 135i: 390bhp +410ftlbs
Feedback: http://www.rovertech.net/forum/viewtopi ... 44&t=83073
rovex
RT BiKiloPoster
Posts: 2391
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 7:23 am
feedback: 1042809

Re: htc one x?

Post by rovex »

Id take the S2 over the One S. To be honest its more powerful, probably only behind the One X and S3 in real terms because the Exynos dual core is WAY faster than Qualcomm and OMAP CPUs in stuff like Sonys, Motos and the Galaxy Nexus, and its software is mature and stable. It also has a batter screen.
Image
jase
RT GOD
Posts: 3785
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 8:39 pm
feedback: 780098
Location: Chester

Re: htc one x?

Post by jase »

From what I saw of some of the benchmarks the S was faster than both the S2 and X! But like the (lack of that quality) screen what i liked about the S was its size its just so much easier to handle and you cant even feel it in your pocket. The effectivly minimal difference in screen and CPU (they are phones after all, not servers or gaming PCs) I dont feel makup for having such a nicer device to handle. Specially as Ill have to live with it for 17months!
Something it eats the S2 for wich is important for me is the camera performance. Tis pretty awesome. Can take snaps while recording HD faster than other phones can do stills on there own. The kids will hate this phone when they are older :)

Of course ive not used an S2, X, S3 etc for an extended period so cant say if the things i didnt like about them actually detract from the things they do do well.





J
"To try is the first step on the long road to failure"

mk3 200ti: 303bhp +323ftlbs http://www.rovertech.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3553
BMW 135i: 390bhp +410ftlbs
Feedback: http://www.rovertech.net/forum/viewtopi ... 44&t=83073
rovex
RT BiKiloPoster
Posts: 2391
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 7:23 am
feedback: 1042809

Re: htc one x?

Post by rovex »

Benchmarks dont tell the whole story. The Exynos has a dual channel memory controller that the Tegra 3 lacks and the S4 CPU in the One S doesnt do very well. The result is a much smoother device, it really is unshakable. The GPU in the S2 has 'free' 4x MSAA (multisampling anti-aliasing) which no other GPU has, this results in smooth graphics that run quickly, its also got the best video support in the industry. While the dual core units age makes it benchmark slower in theoretical tests, in games because it has memory bandwidth advantages, the device never slows down while performing non graphical operations.

While the Tegra 3 and S4 CPUs can out benchmark the Exynos dual core in theoretical tests, in the real world Exynos just feels better. This is why i have decided on a Galaxy S3, the quad Exynos is just stunning. The Exynos range is the only range i can think of that doesnt have something broken in its design. The Tegra range is just a collection of broken elements, its rubbish. The T2 (as in my tab 8.9) is dire, and the T3 (as in the Transformer prime and One X) seems only to hide these issues behind raw horsepower, but they do show themselves at times.

The One S camera has more features, but is it better? Id say not. Its actually the same sensor as the S2, but HTC have poor compression software resulting in an inferior image.

It a shame because i like the 'One' range very much, its WAY better looking than the S3, but the S3 features are just killer.
Image
Din
Rovertech Moderator
Rovertech Moderator
Posts: 10894
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 8:13 pm
feedback: 901190

Re: htc one x?

Post by Din »

Anyone got the HTC yet ?

Still very tempted :) i know all this battery life talk is crap etc etc, but tbh i dont use mine a huge amount dureing the day due to my job.

The contracts for the Samsung as expected are a couple of quid more expensive, and tbh i dont like the look of it.

So anyone :)
Dan Overton, 2002 MG ZS Turbo.
Vard66 wrote: our feelings about saloons shall never be the wedge between us
Image
Din
Rovertech Moderator
Rovertech Moderator
Posts: 10894
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 8:13 pm
feedback: 901190

Re: htc one x?

Post by Din »

You know what balls... im oing to order the one x in acouple of weeks just because i want it :lol:
Dan Overton, 2002 MG ZS Turbo.
Vard66 wrote: our feelings about saloons shall never be the wedge between us
Image
Phoenix3dfx225
Rovertech Kiloposter
Posts: 1321
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 12:11 pm
feedback: 1308326
Location: Lytham St Annes, Lancashire

Re: htc one x?

Post by Phoenix3dfx225 »

Well got his SGS3 yesterday and its awesome! Great screen and performance! 5600 on Quadrant (a benchmark util) and runs Grand Theft Auto 3 on Max settings smooths and sweet.

So so want one already, but renewal aint till October!
Image
rovex
RT BiKiloPoster
Posts: 2391
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 7:23 am
feedback: 1042809

Re: htc one x?

Post by rovex »

I agree, i have my S3 now as well. Its really well made, no flex, or creak and the 'plastic' back looks and feels more like enamel than coated polycarbonate. The Ones Xs ive seen have all creaked and flexed like 200 coupe on a dirt track!

Its also very fast, and silky smooth and just does everything so very well.
Image
lennox1185
Rovertech Veteran
Posts: 938
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:05 pm
feedback: 1051360
Location: Coventry

Re: htc one x?

Post by lennox1185 »

I've had my HTC One X for about 6-7 weeks now.

I'd say go for it. It's a great phone. I had an iphone 3G for 4 years before my HTC, and i'm glad I made the move.

The Galaxy S3 is no better than the HTC, yet Samsungs lose value and generally feel tacky.

The HTC One X feels solid, yet light weight.

The only Cons are there is only 1 unlock button and it's at the top (makes it a little hard to unlock 1-handed) and its so so smooth. Almost droppable smooth!
1994 Rover Coupe Turbo for the booooost
2004 MG ZT CDTi+ 135 for the mpg
Image
rovex
RT BiKiloPoster
Posts: 2391
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 7:23 am
feedback: 1042809

Re: htc one x?

Post by rovex »

It's not even close, the one X feels last generation compared to the S3. I just sold my S2 for 275. Not bad for a year old phone, I've seen one Xs for not much more.

I agonized for ages over waiting for the S3, I even had a one X for a week but it's no match for the S3 which is better built, smoother, faster and has more features, both in software and hardware.
Image
Din
Rovertech Moderator
Rovertech Moderator
Posts: 10894
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 8:13 pm
feedback: 901190

Re: htc one x?

Post by Din »

..... im getting a one x tomorrow :w00t:
Dan Overton, 2002 MG ZS Turbo.
Vard66 wrote: our feelings about saloons shall never be the wedge between us
Image
crazygary
Rovertech Kiloposter
Posts: 1392
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 8:48 am
feedback: 986176
Location: Swansea

Re: htc one x?

Post by crazygary »

Good choice, I've had mine for over a month.
Just buy a car charger for 99p and the battery lasts fine.
CrAzY GaRy
-----------------
620ti
RichMk3
Rovertech Veteran
Posts: 683
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 9:59 am
feedback: 1291088
Location: Wielding a Big Hammer...

Re: htc one x?

Post by RichMk3 »

I've had mine since launch date, generally its ok, but I'm not overly impressed. The battery life is crap and the thing draws so much power it can't run the satnav and charge at the same time with a car charger. It's not the HTC car dock thou, maybe that's better I don't know.
Daily Driver - 2004 MK2 ZS180

Toy - 1999 MK3 200
notroubleclubber
RT BiKiloPoster
Posts: 2330
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 3:24 pm
feedback: 1040437
Location: Swindon, Wilts

Re: htc one x?

Post by notroubleclubber »

My iPhone 4 is due for renewal now.
I've been offered an galaxy s3.
Is it better than the iPhone 4?
I use my iPhone for everything (more than my laptop or iPad) and its jailbroken too so even more available.
I couldn't imagine a phone being any better so do I go for the 4s, stick with the 4, wait for the i5 or go for the sg3?
What more can the sg3 give me?
I feel the need................. the need to boost!
lennox1185
Rovertech Veteran
Posts: 938
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:05 pm
feedback: 1051360
Location: Coventry

Re: htc one x?

Post by lennox1185 »

RichMk3 wrote:I've had mine since launch date, generally its ok, but I'm not overly impressed. The battery life is crap and the thing draws so much power it can't run the satnav and charge at the same time with a car charger. It's not the HTC car dock thou, maybe that's better I don't know.
To save power swithc off all the Sync's you don't need. The only Sync I have is email and weather.

My brother in law has the one X too, and complained about battery life. Checked his sync and they were all on... Facebook, Twatter, Show Me, Whatsapp, googoe mail, htc account, drop box, stocks....the lot!

I can leave my oneX on standby all day and it only uses about 15%
1994 Rover Coupe Turbo for the booooost
2004 MG ZT CDTi+ 135 for the mpg
Image
Post Reply

Return to “PC/Mobile Phone/SatNav Chat/Tech Questions”